- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Regnery Publishing. czar 17:06, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
The Politically Incorrect Guide
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Politically Incorrect Guide ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Failing to see how this subject meets notability criteria. Article seems to just list books in the series and provide an advertisement-like blurb to the series. Boredintheevening ( talk) 20:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Not all of the books in the list are blue-linked, and the wiki-notability case for some of them looks a bit dubious. For example, The Politically Incorrect Guide to English and American Literature doesn't seem to have made much of a splash, and The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design is just a redirect to a brief section in Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate). So, arguing that the list needs to exist is somewhat of an uphill task. Is there any reason why the existence of this series can't be briefly described at Regnery Publishing? XOR'easter ( talk) 21:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Very selective merge to Regnery Publishing. Most of the books don't appear to be wiki-notable in their own right, so the navigational utility of the list is limited, and the series does not appear to be discussed as a whole either. In short, there's a bit to say about it, but it doesn't need a stand-alone article. The blue-linked items from the list and the contents of the "Criticisms" section could be added to § Regnery Publishing (1993–present). XOR'easter ( talk) 00:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 22:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 22:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Merge per XOR'easter. Wouldn't be better as a standalone article. Sungodtemple ( talk) 23:13, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Regnery Publishing. czar 17:06, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
The Politically Incorrect Guide
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Politically Incorrect Guide ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Failing to see how this subject meets notability criteria. Article seems to just list books in the series and provide an advertisement-like blurb to the series. Boredintheevening ( talk) 20:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Not all of the books in the list are blue-linked, and the wiki-notability case for some of them looks a bit dubious. For example, The Politically Incorrect Guide to English and American Literature doesn't seem to have made much of a splash, and The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design is just a redirect to a brief section in Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate). So, arguing that the list needs to exist is somewhat of an uphill task. Is there any reason why the existence of this series can't be briefly described at Regnery Publishing? XOR'easter ( talk) 21:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Very selective merge to Regnery Publishing. Most of the books don't appear to be wiki-notable in their own right, so the navigational utility of the list is limited, and the series does not appear to be discussed as a whole either. In short, there's a bit to say about it, but it doesn't need a stand-alone article. The blue-linked items from the list and the contents of the "Criticisms" section could be added to § Regnery Publishing (1993–present). XOR'easter ( talk) 00:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 22:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 22:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Merge per XOR'easter. Wouldn't be better as a standalone article. Sungodtemple ( talk) 23:13, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.