The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Much of this article appears to be a very close paraphrasing (and at times, blatant copy-paste) of a book referenced in the ref section. One of the previous editors is the author of that book, which leads me to believe this is a lot of original research and violates WP:MOS in several ways. This should be sent back to drafts at the very least. Lindsey40186 ( talk) 01:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Much of this article appears to be a very close paraphrasing (and at times, blatant copy-paste) of a book referenced in the ref section. One of the previous editors is the author of that book, which leads me to believe this is a lot of original research and violates WP:MOS in several ways. This should be sent back to drafts at the very least. Lindsey40186 ( talk) 01:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)