The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 20:24, 12 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Reason - doesn't establish notability. I should comment on the references - it is well referenced - the majority are self references, or articles by Richard R. Kunz or Paul M. Weyrich, both closely involved with the magazine (ie founder, editor in chief). Other references are links to worldcat and internet archive. The only source that goes some way to establishing notability is that issues of the magazine was reviewed in Light Rail & Modern Tramway magazine. Seems to be somewhat overblown coverage overall eg Issues were 46–50 pages in length until 1994, thereafter 38–40 pages. The magazine used good-quality paper which suggests to me that there is really little to say. May or may not be notable, needs looking at. Oranjblud ( talk) 00:34, 5 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 20:24, 12 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Reason - doesn't establish notability. I should comment on the references - it is well referenced - the majority are self references, or articles by Richard R. Kunz or Paul M. Weyrich, both closely involved with the magazine (ie founder, editor in chief). Other references are links to worldcat and internet archive. The only source that goes some way to establishing notability is that issues of the magazine was reviewed in Light Rail & Modern Tramway magazine. Seems to be somewhat overblown coverage overall eg Issues were 46–50 pages in length until 1994, thereafter 38–40 pages. The magazine used good-quality paper which suggests to me that there is really little to say. May or may not be notable, needs looking at. Oranjblud ( talk) 00:34, 5 July 2012 (UTC) reply