The result was no consensus. Sources used are very questionable; they should be challenged and removed before the article is renominated. Shii (tock) 06:23, 1 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Episode is not notable due to having no independent outside significant (emphasis intended) coverage. References used and sources exist are ratings sites. Curb Chain ( talk) 10:53, 16 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Sources used are very questionable; they should be challenged and removed before the article is renominated. Shii (tock) 06:23, 1 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Episode is not notable due to having no independent outside significant (emphasis intended) coverage. References used and sources exist are ratings sites. Curb Chain ( talk) 10:53, 16 March 2013 (UTC) reply