From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:48, 6 July 2018 (UTC) reply

The Mississauga Blob

The Mississauga Blob (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article covers a very minor incident that likely fails notability. Primary purpose for previous "keep" seems to be debunking WP:FRINGE UFO claims. – dlthewave 03:46, 29 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:55, 29 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • delete Minor bit of (literal) Forteana which attracted no notice outside of compilers of the same. Mangoe ( talk) 18:55, 29 June 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. TMG talk 19:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. TMG talk 19:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Comment More WP:RS may exist, such as coverage supposedly published in the Toronto Sun and The Globe and Mail, but like most pre-internet sources, they are near impossible to access and confirm. Likely delete unless sources are unearthed. - LuckyLouie ( talk) 19:49, 29 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep As long as better sourcing can be found, and the article expanded a bit. TH1980 ( talk) 02:16, 30 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Wikipedia is not Snopes — it is not our job to keep an article about somebody chucking a flaming frisbee over a fence just because some people still point to the incident as supposed proof of UFOs. This has not received the degree of reliable source coverage needed to justify an encyclopedia article. Bearcat ( talk) 20:07, 3 July 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:48, 6 July 2018 (UTC) reply

The Mississauga Blob

The Mississauga Blob (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article covers a very minor incident that likely fails notability. Primary purpose for previous "keep" seems to be debunking WP:FRINGE UFO claims. – dlthewave 03:46, 29 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:55, 29 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • delete Minor bit of (literal) Forteana which attracted no notice outside of compilers of the same. Mangoe ( talk) 18:55, 29 June 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. TMG talk 19:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. TMG talk 19:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Comment More WP:RS may exist, such as coverage supposedly published in the Toronto Sun and The Globe and Mail, but like most pre-internet sources, they are near impossible to access and confirm. Likely delete unless sources are unearthed. - LuckyLouie ( talk) 19:49, 29 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep As long as better sourcing can be found, and the article expanded a bit. TH1980 ( talk) 02:16, 30 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Wikipedia is not Snopes — it is not our job to keep an article about somebody chucking a flaming frisbee over a fence just because some people still point to the incident as supposed proof of UFOs. This has not received the degree of reliable source coverage needed to justify an encyclopedia article. Bearcat ( talk) 20:07, 3 July 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook