The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Now defunct magazine, currently memorialised on the co-publisher's website. Fails WP:GNG, WP:WEB. No evidence of notability during its short life and none online. Sourcing is merely a list of interviews they ran, zero evidence of sustained independent coverage. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 12:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Now defunct magazine, currently memorialised on the co-publisher's website. Fails WP:GNG, WP:WEB. No evidence of notability during its short life and none online. Sourcing is merely a list of interviews they ran, zero evidence of sustained independent coverage. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 12:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)