From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010(talk) 23:05, 13 August 2014 (UTC) reply

The King of Kings (2012 painting) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources in this article don't have anything to do with the subject (the painting) itself. And it seems to consist mostly of original research interpretation. Holdek ( talk) 15:16, 13 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Withdrawn by nominator. I'm actually going to propose this for deletion instead. -- Holdek ( talk) 15:29, 13 August 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010(talk) 23:05, 13 August 2014 (UTC) reply

The King of Kings (2012 painting) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources in this article don't have anything to do with the subject (the painting) itself. And it seems to consist mostly of original research interpretation. Holdek ( talk) 15:16, 13 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Withdrawn by nominator. I'm actually going to propose this for deletion instead. -- Holdek ( talk) 15:29, 13 August 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook