- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Procedural close. Since nom is a blocked sock, no one is arguing for deletion. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 14:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Historical Breechloading Smallarms Association ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
does not pass the general notability criteria. Fails WP:GNG, Previously deleted. Numan765 ( talk) 12:55, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: the nominator has been blocked as a sock. See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikibaji/Archive#26 May 2020 -- Aaqib Anjum Aafī ( talk) 15:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- Seems rather subjective to me; please see my comments. What more information would you require than what is there to establish notability? knirirr ( talk) 13:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I've added a couple more references whilst waiting for more responses. knirirr ( talk) 10:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 17:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 17:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 17:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 09:33, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 09:33, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Procedural close. Since nom is a blocked sock, no one is arguing for deletion. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 14:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Historical Breechloading Smallarms Association ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
does not pass the general notability criteria. Fails WP:GNG, Previously deleted. Numan765 ( talk) 12:55, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: the nominator has been blocked as a sock. See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikibaji/Archive#26 May 2020 -- Aaqib Anjum Aafī ( talk) 15:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- Seems rather subjective to me; please see my comments. What more information would you require than what is there to establish notability? knirirr ( talk) 13:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I've added a couple more references whilst waiting for more responses. knirirr ( talk) 10:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 17:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 17:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 17:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 09:33, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 09:33, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.