The result was Delete per WP:CORP. --- J.S ( T/ C) 04:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC) reply
No real notability, page seems to be being used mostly for vanity entries Lost tourist 15:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Agreed. Last paragraph has to go, and there's nothing left beyond a directory entry and no notability. Delete Emeraude 16:31, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
trust me mate iv been to the george a lot. "piss head" bishai is always there and he basically is the reason it didnt close. hes pretty famous throughout east london. theres no need to take this down. J. Stevens— Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitemooooorn ( talk • contribs)
1) The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company or corporation itself. This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations except for the following: Media reprints of press releases, other publications where the company or corporation talks about itself, and advertising for the company. Works carrying merely trivial coverage, such as newspaper articles that simply report extended shopping hours or the publications of telephone numbers and addresses in business directories Nope, nothing sourced and nothing found online
2)The company or corporation is listed on ranking indices of important companies produced by well-known and independent publications. Um no...
3)The company's or corporation's share price is used to calculate stock market indices. Being used to calculate an index that simply comprises the entire market is excluded. Being a bar/pub, I highly doubt this would ever happen.
Since this is a bar/pub, we could say it offers a service (serving alcohol) so...
1) The product or service has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself.This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations except for the following: Media re-prints of press releases, other publications where the company or corporation talks about its products or services, and advertising for the product or service. Newspaper stories that do not credit a reporter or a news service and simply present company news in an uncritical or positive way may be treated as press releases unless there is evidence to the contrary. Works carrying merely trivial coverage, such as simple price listings in product catalogues.
Still no.
2) The product or service is so well-known that its trademark has suffered from genericization Nope. This hasn't happened.
Fails WP:Corp, is NN, Doesn't cite sources. Nuke it. -- Brian ( How am I doing?) 21:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
PLEASE NOTE User 87.74.17.102 altered my comments above, inserting the sentence: "Even so, this is no reason for deletion" and changing my vote from Delete to Do not Delete. (Evidence is here: [ [1]]. He has also been one of the main recent contributors to the article. Emeraude 00:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC). reply
By the way, as a gay man I find your comments very insulting. Gay people have the same rights as you, you biggot.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitemooooorn ( talk • contribs)
I'v definately read articles about this character in the Wanstead and Ilford Guardian. Their website isnt brilliant but the article might be souced in there.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitemooooorn ( talk • contribs)
The result was Delete per WP:CORP. --- J.S ( T/ C) 04:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC) reply
No real notability, page seems to be being used mostly for vanity entries Lost tourist 15:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Agreed. Last paragraph has to go, and there's nothing left beyond a directory entry and no notability. Delete Emeraude 16:31, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
trust me mate iv been to the george a lot. "piss head" bishai is always there and he basically is the reason it didnt close. hes pretty famous throughout east london. theres no need to take this down. J. Stevens— Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitemooooorn ( talk • contribs)
1) The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company or corporation itself. This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations except for the following: Media reprints of press releases, other publications where the company or corporation talks about itself, and advertising for the company. Works carrying merely trivial coverage, such as newspaper articles that simply report extended shopping hours or the publications of telephone numbers and addresses in business directories Nope, nothing sourced and nothing found online
2)The company or corporation is listed on ranking indices of important companies produced by well-known and independent publications. Um no...
3)The company's or corporation's share price is used to calculate stock market indices. Being used to calculate an index that simply comprises the entire market is excluded. Being a bar/pub, I highly doubt this would ever happen.
Since this is a bar/pub, we could say it offers a service (serving alcohol) so...
1) The product or service has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself.This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations except for the following: Media re-prints of press releases, other publications where the company or corporation talks about its products or services, and advertising for the product or service. Newspaper stories that do not credit a reporter or a news service and simply present company news in an uncritical or positive way may be treated as press releases unless there is evidence to the contrary. Works carrying merely trivial coverage, such as simple price listings in product catalogues.
Still no.
2) The product or service is so well-known that its trademark has suffered from genericization Nope. This hasn't happened.
Fails WP:Corp, is NN, Doesn't cite sources. Nuke it. -- Brian ( How am I doing?) 21:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
PLEASE NOTE User 87.74.17.102 altered my comments above, inserting the sentence: "Even so, this is no reason for deletion" and changing my vote from Delete to Do not Delete. (Evidence is here: [ [1]]. He has also been one of the main recent contributors to the article. Emeraude 00:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC). reply
By the way, as a gay man I find your comments very insulting. Gay people have the same rights as you, you biggot.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitemooooorn ( talk • contribs)
I'v definately read articles about this character in the Wanstead and Ilford Guardian. Their website isnt brilliant but the article might be souced in there.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitemooooorn ( talk • contribs)