The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep because while a redirect might serve, BEFORE seems to show this album as getting enough genre attention to meet
WP:NALBUMS. IE:
[1] and
[2] for instance. Jus' sayin. And while nice were it done,
WP:NEXIST does not mandate the thing be sourced just that is eventually sourcable. Schmidt, Michael Q. 21:58, 20 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Vipinhari||talk 16:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect. The two reviews given by MichaelQSchmidt don't constitute substantial coverage in significant sources.
The king of the sun (
talk) 17:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect as there's still nothing for a solidly better notable article.
SwisterTwistertalk 03:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep because while a redirect might serve, BEFORE seems to show this album as getting enough genre attention to meet
WP:NALBUMS. IE:
[1] and
[2] for instance. Jus' sayin. And while nice were it done,
WP:NEXIST does not mandate the thing be sourced just that is eventually sourcable. Schmidt, Michael Q. 21:58, 20 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Vipinhari||talk 16:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect. The two reviews given by MichaelQSchmidt don't constitute substantial coverage in significant sources.
The king of the sun (
talk) 17:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect as there's still nothing for a solidly better notable article.
SwisterTwistertalk 03:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.