- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 14:58, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
The Erawan Group
- The Erawan Group ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:COMPANY and tagged for notability since June 2008. Proposed deletion contested by Paul 012. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 04:33, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n( talk page) 13:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n( talk page) 13:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk) 16:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk) 16:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep You can see the company receives regular coverage here [1]. Some more examples from The Nation [2] [3] [4], Bangkok Post [5] [6] [7] -- Lerdsuwa ( talk) 14:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, based on the sources provided by Lerdsuwa there does appear to be at least regional coverage in Thailand. The company is listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET100). The article certainly needs much improvement. MB ( talk) 04:10, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – Meets WP:CORPDEPTH per a review of available sources. Some sources are paywalled, but the headlines are directly about the company itself. North America 1000 03:58, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 ( T) 14:58, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
The Erawan Group
- The Erawan Group ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:COMPANY and tagged for notability since June 2008. Proposed deletion contested by Paul 012. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 04:33, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n( talk page) 13:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n( talk page) 13:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk) 16:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk) 16:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep You can see the company receives regular coverage here [1]. Some more examples from The Nation [2] [3] [4], Bangkok Post [5] [6] [7] -- Lerdsuwa ( talk) 14:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, based on the sources provided by Lerdsuwa there does appear to be at least regional coverage in Thailand. The company is listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET100). The article certainly needs much improvement. MB ( talk) 04:10, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – Meets WP:CORPDEPTH per a review of available sources. Some sources are paywalled, but the headlines are directly about the company itself. North America 1000 03:58, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.