The result was Redirect. Interested editor may merge from history as warranted. Xoloz 17:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Poorly written, badly sourced tripe... absolutely no notably anywhere on the page--didn't see much of any sort anywhere, conferences are notoriously NOT notable, will change if evidence given on page... and by evidence, I do NOT mean a local news network running a segment, see talk page for notability questions —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kmaguir1 ( talk • contribs) .
Also, further evidence of notability - this is CNN coverage [2]. So, the conference was newsworthy, by wiki criteria, it should be included! 137.205.132.170 10:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect. Interested editor may merge from history as warranted. Xoloz 17:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Poorly written, badly sourced tripe... absolutely no notably anywhere on the page--didn't see much of any sort anywhere, conferences are notoriously NOT notable, will change if evidence given on page... and by evidence, I do NOT mean a local news network running a segment, see talk page for notability questions —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kmaguir1 ( talk • contribs) .
Also, further evidence of notability - this is CNN coverage [2]. So, the conference was newsworthy, by wiki criteria, it should be included! 137.205.132.170 10:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC) reply