The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 19:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Verification failed. CoreCodec, Inc. does not seem to have any media player for Windows. (It only makes a CorePlayer for mobile devices.) Fleet Command ( talk) 10:12, 28 June 2011 (UTC) reply
As Wikipedia:Verifiability says, yes, you must explain yourself because your sources are not enough to prove most of what is written in the article. And as Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not says "Wikipedia is not an advertisement platform" for your favorite product: Subject of an article must receive significant coverage in reliable secondary sources.
And if I must explain everything, Wikipedia:Wikilawyering says, we do not cause unnecessary inconveniences for each other; so if the article has multiple grounds for deletion that can be addressed in one AfD, then we stick to Wikipedia:Snowball clause. Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions says, we do not deny the antecedents. Fleet Command ( talk) 11:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Cirt ( talk) 19:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Verification failed. CoreCodec, Inc. does not seem to have any media player for Windows. (It only makes a CorePlayer for mobile devices.) Fleet Command ( talk) 10:12, 28 June 2011 (UTC) reply
As Wikipedia:Verifiability says, yes, you must explain yourself because your sources are not enough to prove most of what is written in the article. And as Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not says "Wikipedia is not an advertisement platform" for your favorite product: Subject of an article must receive significant coverage in reliable secondary sources.
And if I must explain everything, Wikipedia:Wikilawyering says, we do not cause unnecessary inconveniences for each other; so if the article has multiple grounds for deletion that can be addressed in one AfD, then we stick to Wikipedia:Snowball clause. Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions says, we do not deny the antecedents. Fleet Command ( talk) 11:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC) reply