The result was Keep all, with no objections to individual or group renominations. We have fairly clear guidelines on group nominations - I would advise that people follow them. Ironholds ( talk) 19:42, 23 February 2011 (UTC) reply
I'm nominating this article and all of the books on the List of Fighting Fantasy gamebooks by Puffin apart from those with links. There are over 50. Until recently all of those books had there own article in the mainspace which have only just been set as redirects. A fair amount of content has been removed by an SPA and from an IP that has been used by a sock puppet. I'd prefer these books returned to mainspace but they may not be worthy. I generally think as these books have sold in the tens of millions collectively a wider range of opinions are required to see what should happen to these articles. Szzuk ( talk) 22:11, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
If it helps, I found more White Dwarf reviews:
That's all I have for now. I'll try to add these when I can. BOZ ( talk) 04:02, 16 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep all, with no objections to individual or group renominations. We have fairly clear guidelines on group nominations - I would advise that people follow them. Ironholds ( talk) 19:42, 23 February 2011 (UTC) reply
I'm nominating this article and all of the books on the List of Fighting Fantasy gamebooks by Puffin apart from those with links. There are over 50. Until recently all of those books had there own article in the mainspace which have only just been set as redirects. A fair amount of content has been removed by an SPA and from an IP that has been used by a sock puppet. I'd prefer these books returned to mainspace but they may not be worthy. I generally think as these books have sold in the tens of millions collectively a wider range of opinions are required to see what should happen to these articles. Szzuk ( talk) 22:11, 29 January 2011 (UTC) reply
If it helps, I found more White Dwarf reviews:
That's all I have for now. I'll try to add these when I can. BOZ ( talk) 04:02, 16 February 2011 (UTC) reply