- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Princess Chelsea. (non-admin closure) J947 † edits 03:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
The Cigarette Duet
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Cigarette Duet ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is mainly sourced to an interview and two self published sources. In my opinion, the article shows no signs of passing WP:GNG. All sources I could find (in the article and during a WP:BEFORE search) only give the song passing mentions; I can't find any significant coverage of the song. Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 16:12, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and New Zealand. Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 16:12, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep:
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5] are all brief mentions, yes, but they do all emphasize how big a hit the song was on YouTube (over 74 million views per that last page) which I think has to be worth something. Most coverage calls it her starmaking moment, so if she's notable then it seems consensus agrees it's because of this song.
QuietHere (
talk |
contributions)
16:43, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- If anything, that seems like a reason to merge for me. There is no significant coverage of this song, so it might be better to include these notes in the artist's article? Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 16:51, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge I think a merge to the artist is fine, some notability for the song, not enough for an article though. Oaktree b ( talk) 19:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:25, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Princess Chelsea. (non-admin closure) J947 † edits 03:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
The Cigarette Duet
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Cigarette Duet ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is mainly sourced to an interview and two self published sources. In my opinion, the article shows no signs of passing WP:GNG. All sources I could find (in the article and during a WP:BEFORE search) only give the song passing mentions; I can't find any significant coverage of the song. Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 16:12, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and New Zealand. Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 16:12, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep:
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5] are all brief mentions, yes, but they do all emphasize how big a hit the song was on YouTube (over 74 million views per that last page) which I think has to be worth something. Most coverage calls it her starmaking moment, so if she's notable then it seems consensus agrees it's because of this song.
QuietHere (
talk |
contributions)
16:43, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- If anything, that seems like a reason to merge for me. There is no significant coverage of this song, so it might be better to include these notes in the artist's article? Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 16:51, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge I think a merge to the artist is fine, some notability for the song, not enough for an article though. Oaktree b ( talk) 19:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:25, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.