The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep and w/o prejudice to a speedy renomination. Relisted twice so it's time to move on, but I must say I was not overly impressed by the level of policy/guideline based arguments presented here.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
01:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete because the author is notable, the publisher serious, and the topic intriguing, I tried to source this one. No go. Best I came up with was a press release the year it was published.
E.M.Gregory (
talk)
23:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect to the author article,
Jukka Rislakki. I was not able to find sufficient independent reviews to establish stand-alone notability for the book. There's no need for two separate articles.
K.e.coffman (
talk)
19:14, 24 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep and w/o prejudice to a speedy renomination. Relisted twice so it's time to move on, but I must say I was not overly impressed by the level of policy/guideline based arguments presented here.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
01:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete because the author is notable, the publisher serious, and the topic intriguing, I tried to source this one. No go. Best I came up with was a press release the year it was published.
E.M.Gregory (
talk)
23:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect to the author article,
Jukka Rislakki. I was not able to find sufficient independent reviews to establish stand-alone notability for the book. There's no need for two separate articles.
K.e.coffman (
talk)
19:14, 24 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.