- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( talk) 11:05, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
The Blackberry Bush
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Blackberry Bush ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Book with no assertion of notability. One of the reviews mentioned (and uncited) does not appear to exist and the other is published on Blogspot. The creator of the article, User:In.tripletime appears to be the son of the author, which is an undeclared WP:COI. Axem Titanium ( talk) 06:10, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I'm not seeing the independent coverage that would merit notability under WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Catrìona ( talk) 13:47, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. I wanted to save this, as I love the cover (that's a reason to want to save something, right?) but there just isn't enough coverage out there to show where this book passes NBOOK. Of note is that the uncited review is from Examiner, which is on Wikipedia's blacklist and not considered to be a reliable source. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( talk) 11:05, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
The Blackberry Bush
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Blackberry Bush ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Book with no assertion of notability. One of the reviews mentioned (and uncited) does not appear to exist and the other is published on Blogspot. The creator of the article, User:In.tripletime appears to be the son of the author, which is an undeclared WP:COI. Axem Titanium ( talk) 06:10, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I'm not seeing the independent coverage that would merit notability under WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Catrìona ( talk) 13:47, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. I wanted to save this, as I love the cover (that's a reason to want to save something, right?) but there just isn't enough coverage out there to show where this book passes NBOOK. Of note is that the uncited review is from Examiner, which is on Wikipedia's blacklist and not considered to be a reliable source. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.