- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:55, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- The Best of Sissel ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article needs evidence that the product is notable. I can't find any such evidence in the article, and also not on the first few pages of search results on Google. As it only seems to collect songs from elsewhere, it is probably not notable. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:09, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 1000 00:40, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 1000 00:41, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 1000 00:41, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Nothing notable. Imaginatorium ( talk) 06:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: The information is already included in Sissel Kyrkjebø discography, this article has no additional info. Vrac ( talk) 02:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dea
db
eef
00:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)- Delete. Articles on compilations need more than one line of prose, a tracklisting and an infobox, and I don't see coverage that could take this beyond that level. -- Michig ( talk) 08:11, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:55, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- The Best of Sissel ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article needs evidence that the product is notable. I can't find any such evidence in the article, and also not on the first few pages of search results on Google. As it only seems to collect songs from elsewhere, it is probably not notable. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:09, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 1000 00:40, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 1000 00:41, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 1000 00:41, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Nothing notable. Imaginatorium ( talk) 06:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: The information is already included in Sissel Kyrkjebø discography, this article has no additional info. Vrac ( talk) 02:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dea
db
eef
00:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)- Delete. Articles on compilations need more than one line of prose, a tracklisting and an infobox, and I don't see coverage that could take this beyond that level. -- Michig ( talk) 08:11, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.