- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 03:45, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
The Astral Factor
- The Astral Factor ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable album: lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 01:57, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 01:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep has coverage in metal and prog rock websites, seems to be notable . These sources aren't on the avoid list [1] and [2], there are others, including disputed drwp. It would help if there was a list of RS for music for each language. Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:45, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 15:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 15:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - per sources. BabbaQ ( talk) 17:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- The two presented sources presented do not establish notability. Metal Norge reviews anything sent to them, [3] so it cannot be used to establish notability. I don't think either of them can be considered a reliable source. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 03:45, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
The Astral Factor
- The Astral Factor ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable album: lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 01:57, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 01:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep has coverage in metal and prog rock websites, seems to be notable . These sources aren't on the avoid list [1] and [2], there are others, including disputed drwp. It would help if there was a list of RS for music for each language. Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:45, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 15:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 15:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - per sources. BabbaQ ( talk) 17:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- The two presented sources presented do not establish notability. Metal Norge reviews anything sent to them, [3] so it cannot be used to establish notability. I don't think either of them can be considered a reliable source. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.