The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 02:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Unreliable sources are all that is provided. discogs is not a
reliable source. Google search does not produce any reliable links. Article was deleted before. Was PRODded today. OP removed the PROD, so to AfD we go.
Alexf(talk) 21:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as nom. There are no reliable sources I can find. Google does not list any. The OP lists discogs.com, not a reliable source, and entries in Wikipedia itself, definitely not what we are looking for. --
Alexf(talk) 01:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete not notable, previously speedy deleted page and probably trying to use Wikipedia page as an advertisement.
Nicky mathew (
talk) 11:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Do Not Delete Actually, I am not trying to use this page as an advertisement. As you can see, I've added various new sources to show that if Love In This Club is a notable addition to Wikipedia, then the producers who helped craft the song should be also. If editors want us to be nice, can you please live by your own rules and please assume positive intent in return. Thank you.
Mrenytfall (
talk)16:43, 25 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment I'm not sure if the duo merits an article, but here are at least a couple of references that might get one or both to meet
WP:COMPOSER as individuals:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans // 03:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete at best and draft & userfy for now until a better article is available.
SwisterTwistertalk 21:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 02:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Unreliable sources are all that is provided. discogs is not a
reliable source. Google search does not produce any reliable links. Article was deleted before. Was PRODded today. OP removed the PROD, so to AfD we go.
Alexf(talk) 21:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as nom. There are no reliable sources I can find. Google does not list any. The OP lists discogs.com, not a reliable source, and entries in Wikipedia itself, definitely not what we are looking for. --
Alexf(talk) 01:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete not notable, previously speedy deleted page and probably trying to use Wikipedia page as an advertisement.
Nicky mathew (
talk) 11:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Do Not Delete Actually, I am not trying to use this page as an advertisement. As you can see, I've added various new sources to show that if Love In This Club is a notable addition to Wikipedia, then the producers who helped craft the song should be also. If editors want us to be nice, can you please live by your own rules and please assume positive intent in return. Thank you.
Mrenytfall (
talk)16:43, 25 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment I'm not sure if the duo merits an article, but here are at least a couple of references that might get one or both to meet
WP:COMPOSER as individuals:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans // 03:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete at best and draft & userfy for now until a better article is available.
SwisterTwistertalk 21:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.