The result was keep. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 02:13, 12 October 2010 (UTC) reply
fails WP:ORG. most of the coverage merely confirms its existence rather than indepth coverage. [1]. LibStar ( talk) 02:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Seriously, being cited at length on the BBC, with data from your study included, that doesn't count? Report cited and director quoted in a Danish newspaper? (Ask Favonian for a translation if needs be.) An interview on Australian TV? Research cited, partnership explained with notable Australian organization, Royal Life Saving Society Australia, in a Chinese/English newspaper? Swimming lessons noted in Pakistan's best-selling English newspaper? And don't let me hear that all those are just single-line mentions: they are not. Drmies ( talk) 02:10, 8 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 02:13, 12 October 2010 (UTC) reply
fails WP:ORG. most of the coverage merely confirms its existence rather than indepth coverage. [1]. LibStar ( talk) 02:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Seriously, being cited at length on the BBC, with data from your study included, that doesn't count? Report cited and director quoted in a Danish newspaper? (Ask Favonian for a translation if needs be.) An interview on Australian TV? Research cited, partnership explained with notable Australian organization, Royal Life Saving Society Australia, in a Chinese/English newspaper? Swimming lessons noted in Pakistan's best-selling English newspaper? And don't let me hear that all those are just single-line mentions: they are not. Drmies ( talk) 02:10, 8 October 2010 (UTC) reply