The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 08:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete - zero notability —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.202.135.189 ( talk) 02:43, 7 April 2009 (UTC) reply
No assertion of notability by reliable & independent sources. Just a dubious political project initiated by a television personality. Huge vandal attractor. Madcoverboy ( talk) 04:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete as per no assertion of notability. Hierophantasmagoria ( talk) 05:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Do not delete. This article is (sadly) culturally relevant, helping explain a subculture in the American conservative movement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.35.231.93 ( talk) 14:07, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Do not delete. Thousands of people are joining this group and participating in "Tea Parties" around the country. E2a2j ( talk) 14:37, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete for reasons stated above. Non-notable, no significant recognition or response outside of Glenn Beck's show. Neutronium ( talk) 19:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Do Not Delete It might be appropriate to merge this article with another article as it shares beliefs with other conservative campaigns such as the tea party movement. The Glen Beck website claims it has 400,000 members. There are independent websites dedicated to the project as well. Joshm22 ( talk) 04:40, 3 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Do Not Delete The movement is growing and relevant for those who want to find out about Conservatives. The website has gained in less than three weeks 425,453 members and it's still growing.
Keep. The topic has been the subject of multiple new stories, even though those are not listed in the article. [1] Karanacs ( talk) 14:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete In a way it's insulting that he puts on this fake act like he really cares. Until it becomes a really big deal, the article should be deleted just for the time being... -- Gouryella ( talk) 12:28, 4 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete, make mention on Glenn Beck article if need be. Nothing particularly notable about this organization. Article is currently nothing more than a transcript of Beck's show. Notability is not inherited. Just because Beck created this doesn't make it any more notable than Badger Drink's 11 Project, which revolves around the core principle of "Glenn Beck is a moron", featuring the core value of "Any political movement which would deny a human being the right to medical attention is steeped in ignorance and inhumanity". The burden of proof is on the article creators to show us significant mainstream coverage - and first party sources (a.k.a. Beck) do not fit the bill. One would hope the closing admin would see through the (suspiciously large) amount of poorly rationalized !votes - AfD is not a vote. Badger Drink ( talk) 16:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete per nom. Karanacs mentions "multiple new stories" but the google news link brings up 14 hits. 4 hits from examiner.com a site where anyone can sign up and be a writer. The El Paso Times opinion piece has already been removed. The Palmetto Scoop piece is a letter to the editor. The AOL New piece is unrelated, only spam in the comments mention the project. The 2 Right Pundits pieces, the Lone Star Times, the History News Network, the New Hounds, and the NRC Handelsblad piece, are all blogs. And then there's the Human Events piece which mentions the project as a set up to talk about Beck's favorite book, which was authored by the uncle of the guy who wrote this piece! Sarilox ( talk) 17:08, 5 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Strong delete. At most it merits a mention in either Glenn Beck or Glenn Beck Program, but there's nothing really notable about this "project"; it's just a talk show slogan. — Red XIV ( talk) 00:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete. Mention on Glenn Beck article is enough. The current form is just a transcription of what he said on his show. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 16:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete. Certainly doesn't warrant its own entry.
—
Sampo Torgo
[talk]
23:31, June 25, 2024
CDT [
refresh
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 08:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete - zero notability —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.202.135.189 ( talk) 02:43, 7 April 2009 (UTC) reply
No assertion of notability by reliable & independent sources. Just a dubious political project initiated by a television personality. Huge vandal attractor. Madcoverboy ( talk) 04:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete as per no assertion of notability. Hierophantasmagoria ( talk) 05:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Do not delete. This article is (sadly) culturally relevant, helping explain a subculture in the American conservative movement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.35.231.93 ( talk) 14:07, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Do not delete. Thousands of people are joining this group and participating in "Tea Parties" around the country. E2a2j ( talk) 14:37, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete for reasons stated above. Non-notable, no significant recognition or response outside of Glenn Beck's show. Neutronium ( talk) 19:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Do Not Delete It might be appropriate to merge this article with another article as it shares beliefs with other conservative campaigns such as the tea party movement. The Glen Beck website claims it has 400,000 members. There are independent websites dedicated to the project as well. Joshm22 ( talk) 04:40, 3 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Do Not Delete The movement is growing and relevant for those who want to find out about Conservatives. The website has gained in less than three weeks 425,453 members and it's still growing.
Keep. The topic has been the subject of multiple new stories, even though those are not listed in the article. [1] Karanacs ( talk) 14:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete In a way it's insulting that he puts on this fake act like he really cares. Until it becomes a really big deal, the article should be deleted just for the time being... -- Gouryella ( talk) 12:28, 4 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete, make mention on Glenn Beck article if need be. Nothing particularly notable about this organization. Article is currently nothing more than a transcript of Beck's show. Notability is not inherited. Just because Beck created this doesn't make it any more notable than Badger Drink's 11 Project, which revolves around the core principle of "Glenn Beck is a moron", featuring the core value of "Any political movement which would deny a human being the right to medical attention is steeped in ignorance and inhumanity". The burden of proof is on the article creators to show us significant mainstream coverage - and first party sources (a.k.a. Beck) do not fit the bill. One would hope the closing admin would see through the (suspiciously large) amount of poorly rationalized !votes - AfD is not a vote. Badger Drink ( talk) 16:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete per nom. Karanacs mentions "multiple new stories" but the google news link brings up 14 hits. 4 hits from examiner.com a site where anyone can sign up and be a writer. The El Paso Times opinion piece has already been removed. The Palmetto Scoop piece is a letter to the editor. The AOL New piece is unrelated, only spam in the comments mention the project. The 2 Right Pundits pieces, the Lone Star Times, the History News Network, the New Hounds, and the NRC Handelsblad piece, are all blogs. And then there's the Human Events piece which mentions the project as a set up to talk about Beck's favorite book, which was authored by the uncle of the guy who wrote this piece! Sarilox ( talk) 17:08, 5 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Strong delete. At most it merits a mention in either Glenn Beck or Glenn Beck Program, but there's nothing really notable about this "project"; it's just a talk show slogan. — Red XIV ( talk) 00:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete. Mention on Glenn Beck article is enough. The current form is just a transcription of what he said on his show. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 16:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete. Certainly doesn't warrant its own entry.
—
Sampo Torgo
[talk]
23:31, June 25, 2024
CDT [
refresh