The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. It is a notable, serious, television documentary series broadcast nationally in the UK by the BBC during primetime. It has an IMDb article and its narrator is a notable historian who has a Wikipedia article. I cannot understand why anyone would think it is not notable. The article needs improving, which I expected to be done by viewers. The shortness of the article is a reason to expand it, not to delete it.
Jim Michael (
talk)
20:02, 6 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Speedy close as keep, since SL93's sources have unquestionably established notability and no other argument for deletion remains.—
S MarshallT/
C21:33, 6 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep This is a BBC2 series, the 4th most watched programme on the channel w/e 29/4/2012 with 2.58 million viewers.
[10] Why on earth would you want to delete the entry?— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Rcclh (
talk •
contribs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. It is a notable, serious, television documentary series broadcast nationally in the UK by the BBC during primetime. It has an IMDb article and its narrator is a notable historian who has a Wikipedia article. I cannot understand why anyone would think it is not notable. The article needs improving, which I expected to be done by viewers. The shortness of the article is a reason to expand it, not to delete it.
Jim Michael (
talk)
20:02, 6 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Speedy close as keep, since SL93's sources have unquestionably established notability and no other argument for deletion remains.—
S MarshallT/
C21:33, 6 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep This is a BBC2 series, the 4th most watched programme on the channel w/e 29/4/2012 with 2.58 million viewers.
[10] Why on earth would you want to delete the entry?— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Rcclh (
talk •
contribs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.