- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Thanjavur Palace Devastanam Temples. I believe that the merge has already started so this is affirming on an action already being taken. As an aside, it is not necessary to indicate that an AFD participant is the article creator. They are as free to voice their opinion here as anyone else and, as far as I'm concerned, their comments don't need a tag that seems to dismiss them as less worthy than any other editor's words. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanjavur Nisumbasuthani Temple
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Thanjavur Nisumbasuthani Temple ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are notable temples in Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, but this temple is not one of the notable ones. Lack of coverage in reliable media. Only sources are temple directories (yellow pages). Venkat TL ( talk) 07:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion, Hinduism, India, and Tamil Nadu. Venkat TL ( talk) 07:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Vanakkam, Venkat TL. More information about the temple has been added now with reliable media sources. The iconography of the deity, the construction period, the connected story with the temple, the worshipping time and other particulars are added now. I wish to inform that all the photographs were taken on the day of Kumbabishegam and were added earlier. Request to delete Articles for deletion.-- B Jambulingam ( talk) 08:55, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- — Note to closing admin: B Jambulingam ( talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD.
- Vanakkam, @
B Jambulingam I am not convinced that this is a notable temple. This seems to be a run of the mill temple that are found in every street in Tamil Nadu, cities. There is nothing in the page or the refs that make it notable. The build and temple architecture are fairly new and there is no claim from a reliable source or ASI about the ancient history. The claims of old history are promotional and should be taken with a pinch of salt.
- Thanjavur Palace Devasthanam, Thanjavur 613 009 this link is about the page Thanjavur Palace Devastanam Temples. No relevance to the Thanjavur Nisumbasuthani Temple.
- வி.ராம்ஜி, தாலி வரம் தருவாள் நிசும்பசூதனி, இந்து தமிழ் திசை, 8 ஜனவரி 2021 is a totally promotional article, basically an advertorial. It is singing praises about the temple without giving any factual information.
- வெற்றி அருளும் நிசும்பசூதனி, இல்லம் தேடி வரும் இறை தரிசனம், விகடன், 4 ஏப்ரல் 2020 is a promotional article. talking about the deity.
- சும்பன், நிசும்பனை அழித்த தஞ்சாவூர் நிசும்பசூதனி, தினமணி, 16 செப்டம்பர் 2017 is a promotional article. talking about the deity. It says that "This temple is one of the 88 temples under the Thanjavur Palace Devasthanam."
- As claimed, this temple might be a part of the 88 temples of
Thanjavur Palace Devastanam Temples. If so, then this Thanjavur Nisumbasuthani Temple should be listed on the page of the
Thanjavur Palace Devastanam Temples along with the refs. Based on the sources found so far, I see no reason why every minor temple in this group of temples need to be covered in a separate Wikipedia page. Only historically and architecturally significant temples that are covered by independent media should have their own Wikipedia page.
Venkat TL (
talk)
10:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Vanakkam,
Venkat TL. Thanks. Info added in
Palace Devastanam Amman Temples. So,
Thanjavur Nisumbasuthani Temple may be deleted. --
B Jambulingam (
talk)
01:57, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for agreeing to merge, I believe Palace Devastanam Amman Temples should also be merged to Thanjavur Palace Devastanam Temples. I have started merge discussion on talk pages. Venkat TL ( talk) 08:56, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Vanakkam,
Venkat TL. Thanks. Info added in
Palace Devastanam Amman Temples. So,
Thanjavur Nisumbasuthani Temple may be deleted. --
B Jambulingam (
talk)
01:57, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Vanakkam, @
B Jambulingam I am not convinced that this is a notable temple. This seems to be a run of the mill temple that are found in every street in Tamil Nadu, cities. There is nothing in the page or the refs that make it notable. The build and temple architecture are fairly new and there is no claim from a reliable source or ASI about the ancient history. The claims of old history are promotional and should be taken with a pinch of salt.
- Comment this is similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naganatha Pillayar Temple, Thanjavur that was closed as merge. Venkat TL ( talk) 07:16, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Merge to Thanjavur Palace Devastanam Temples. Indeed all the other lists of temples in that same compled should be merged also, there is already a merger discussion to that effect, please sign it. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 16:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Thanjavur Palace Devastanam Temples. I believe that the merge has already started so this is affirming on an action already being taken. As an aside, it is not necessary to indicate that an AFD participant is the article creator. They are as free to voice their opinion here as anyone else and, as far as I'm concerned, their comments don't need a tag that seems to dismiss them as less worthy than any other editor's words. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanjavur Nisumbasuthani Temple
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Thanjavur Nisumbasuthani Temple ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are notable temples in Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, but this temple is not one of the notable ones. Lack of coverage in reliable media. Only sources are temple directories (yellow pages). Venkat TL ( talk) 07:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion, Hinduism, India, and Tamil Nadu. Venkat TL ( talk) 07:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Vanakkam, Venkat TL. More information about the temple has been added now with reliable media sources. The iconography of the deity, the construction period, the connected story with the temple, the worshipping time and other particulars are added now. I wish to inform that all the photographs were taken on the day of Kumbabishegam and were added earlier. Request to delete Articles for deletion.-- B Jambulingam ( talk) 08:55, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- — Note to closing admin: B Jambulingam ( talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD.
- Vanakkam, @
B Jambulingam I am not convinced that this is a notable temple. This seems to be a run of the mill temple that are found in every street in Tamil Nadu, cities. There is nothing in the page or the refs that make it notable. The build and temple architecture are fairly new and there is no claim from a reliable source or ASI about the ancient history. The claims of old history are promotional and should be taken with a pinch of salt.
- Thanjavur Palace Devasthanam, Thanjavur 613 009 this link is about the page Thanjavur Palace Devastanam Temples. No relevance to the Thanjavur Nisumbasuthani Temple.
- வி.ராம்ஜி, தாலி வரம் தருவாள் நிசும்பசூதனி, இந்து தமிழ் திசை, 8 ஜனவரி 2021 is a totally promotional article, basically an advertorial. It is singing praises about the temple without giving any factual information.
- வெற்றி அருளும் நிசும்பசூதனி, இல்லம் தேடி வரும் இறை தரிசனம், விகடன், 4 ஏப்ரல் 2020 is a promotional article. talking about the deity.
- சும்பன், நிசும்பனை அழித்த தஞ்சாவூர் நிசும்பசூதனி, தினமணி, 16 செப்டம்பர் 2017 is a promotional article. talking about the deity. It says that "This temple is one of the 88 temples under the Thanjavur Palace Devasthanam."
- As claimed, this temple might be a part of the 88 temples of
Thanjavur Palace Devastanam Temples. If so, then this Thanjavur Nisumbasuthani Temple should be listed on the page of the
Thanjavur Palace Devastanam Temples along with the refs. Based on the sources found so far, I see no reason why every minor temple in this group of temples need to be covered in a separate Wikipedia page. Only historically and architecturally significant temples that are covered by independent media should have their own Wikipedia page.
Venkat TL (
talk)
10:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Vanakkam,
Venkat TL. Thanks. Info added in
Palace Devastanam Amman Temples. So,
Thanjavur Nisumbasuthani Temple may be deleted. --
B Jambulingam (
talk)
01:57, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for agreeing to merge, I believe Palace Devastanam Amman Temples should also be merged to Thanjavur Palace Devastanam Temples. I have started merge discussion on talk pages. Venkat TL ( talk) 08:56, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Vanakkam,
Venkat TL. Thanks. Info added in
Palace Devastanam Amman Temples. So,
Thanjavur Nisumbasuthani Temple may be deleted. --
B Jambulingam (
talk)
01:57, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Vanakkam, @
B Jambulingam I am not convinced that this is a notable temple. This seems to be a run of the mill temple that are found in every street in Tamil Nadu, cities. There is nothing in the page or the refs that make it notable. The build and temple architecture are fairly new and there is no claim from a reliable source or ASI about the ancient history. The claims of old history are promotional and should be taken with a pinch of salt.
- Comment this is similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naganatha Pillayar Temple, Thanjavur that was closed as merge. Venkat TL ( talk) 07:16, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Merge to Thanjavur Palace Devastanam Temples. Indeed all the other lists of temples in that same compled should be merged also, there is already a merger discussion to that effect, please sign it. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 16:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.