- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:40, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Thaddeus Rutkowski
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Thaddeus Rutkowski ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article created by sockpuppet of User:Rudra.shukla, identical to previous version deleted on G5 basis. ... discospinster talk 22:02, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NAUTHOR. Sources in the article establish it, and the consensus at the last AfD (in 2017, not so long ago) was keep. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 01:56, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 06:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 06:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I see a NYFA award and one Kirkus review; the other sources don't look as strong. Is this all? BTW the last AfD had exactly two legit keep !votes, and some socking. -
Bri.public (
talk)
18:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Bri.public, This encyclopedia entry looked strong to me. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 01:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Eh, it's a stretch to call that an encyclopedia article. That's a listing in Contemporary Authors. czar 17:28, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Weak delete. When reviewing authors, it's worth taking a look to their book reviews. Even if his books do not warrant separate articles, multiple reviews across several books makes the author article at least into a place to aggregate those reviews. I wouldn't give trade pubs like PW much credit for paragraph-long articles but there are several external reviews [1] [2] that put the author on the cusp of notability. Only reviews in Book Review Index are Kirkus and PW. I'd look for at least three reviews from non-trade pubs. Ping me if you find more? I wouldn't give much credence to the 2017 discussion, which lacked sources. czar 17:37, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde ( Talk) 19:01, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde ( Talk) 19:01, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor Talk 05:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Relisting comment: final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor Talk 05:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:40, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Thaddeus Rutkowski
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Thaddeus Rutkowski ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article created by sockpuppet of User:Rudra.shukla, identical to previous version deleted on G5 basis. ... discospinster talk 22:02, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NAUTHOR. Sources in the article establish it, and the consensus at the last AfD (in 2017, not so long ago) was keep. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 01:56, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 06:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 06:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I see a NYFA award and one Kirkus review; the other sources don't look as strong. Is this all? BTW the last AfD had exactly two legit keep !votes, and some socking. -
Bri.public (
talk)
18:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Bri.public, This encyclopedia entry looked strong to me. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 01:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Eh, it's a stretch to call that an encyclopedia article. That's a listing in Contemporary Authors. czar 17:28, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Weak delete. When reviewing authors, it's worth taking a look to their book reviews. Even if his books do not warrant separate articles, multiple reviews across several books makes the author article at least into a place to aggregate those reviews. I wouldn't give trade pubs like PW much credit for paragraph-long articles but there are several external reviews [1] [2] that put the author on the cusp of notability. Only reviews in Book Review Index are Kirkus and PW. I'd look for at least three reviews from non-trade pubs. Ping me if you find more? I wouldn't give much credence to the 2017 discussion, which lacked sources. czar 17:37, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde ( Talk) 19:01, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde ( Talk) 19:01, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor Talk 05:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Relisting comment: final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor Talk 05:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.