The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus to delete.
W.marsh 03:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep As per Jon Awbrey this is an important logical concept. It has already been expanded enough for the Move to Wiktionary tag to be removed.
Seano1 18:58, 22 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus to delete.
W.marsh 03:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep As per Jon Awbrey this is an important logical concept. It has already been expanded enough for the Move to Wiktionary tag to be removed.
Seano1 18:58, 22 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.