The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keepfishhead64 05:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Weak keep as per Ergot's notes; 'weak' because I'd like to see some media references and other sources to go with the notable label and album list, though.
Tony Fox(arf!) 20:09, 18 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep release by a notable label tends to imply notability to me, and Metropolis is as important as they get in Industrial type music.
Matthew Brown (Morven) (
T:
C) 21:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep. Goggle produces 95,200 hits for Terrorfakt ranging from reviews, t-shirt sales, sales venues, etc. Metropolis is indeed the leading industrial label and represents almost 130 artists and distributes for about 80 labels (from their website:
http://www.metropolis-records.com/artists/ . Artists include Apoptygma Berzerk, Assemblage 23, Combichrist, Covenant, Front Line Assembly, KMFDM, Mindless Self Indulgence, Velvet Acid Christ, VNV Nation, Wumpscut) . Surely the entry can and perhaps should be expanded but even more surely it should be kept. It contains useful information for those like me who are researching the band (I own no disks of theirs yet). And the entry compares well with a number of other similar entries for bands. Disparaging remarks about the band or Metropolis are not credible. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Zen Mercury (
talk •
contribs)
Keep band is on a well-known, notable label (one of the oldest and largest in industrial music, if not the oldest and largest); has at least three albums out when
WP:BAND only requires two.
National Airport 23:14, 20 April 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keepfishhead64 05:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Weak keep as per Ergot's notes; 'weak' because I'd like to see some media references and other sources to go with the notable label and album list, though.
Tony Fox(arf!) 20:09, 18 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep release by a notable label tends to imply notability to me, and Metropolis is as important as they get in Industrial type music.
Matthew Brown (Morven) (
T:
C) 21:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep. Goggle produces 95,200 hits for Terrorfakt ranging from reviews, t-shirt sales, sales venues, etc. Metropolis is indeed the leading industrial label and represents almost 130 artists and distributes for about 80 labels (from their website:
http://www.metropolis-records.com/artists/ . Artists include Apoptygma Berzerk, Assemblage 23, Combichrist, Covenant, Front Line Assembly, KMFDM, Mindless Self Indulgence, Velvet Acid Christ, VNV Nation, Wumpscut) . Surely the entry can and perhaps should be expanded but even more surely it should be kept. It contains useful information for those like me who are researching the band (I own no disks of theirs yet). And the entry compares well with a number of other similar entries for bands. Disparaging remarks about the band or Metropolis are not credible. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Zen Mercury (
talk •
contribs)
Keep band is on a well-known, notable label (one of the oldest and largest in industrial music, if not the oldest and largest); has at least three albums out when
WP:BAND only requires two.
National Airport 23:14, 20 April 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.