The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This article has come to my attention when
User:Ppainter, who claims to be Trevor herself, wanted this page deleted for misinformation. An
A7 speedy request was
declined due to her "publishing multiple works in university press editions". I disagree; I think the article does not qualify for
WP:GNG nor
WP:AUTHOR. ~~
lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me •
contribs)
20:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:TNT. Due to the problematic edit history, even if this is a notable topic it would be better to completely start over. That said, I found zero significant coverage of Trevor in my university library search in terms of reviews of her work or works about her; although she does appear to be cited to some extent in the works of other academics. It’s not clear to me that she would pass
WP:NAUTHOR,
WP:NACADEMIC, or
WP:GNG.
4meter4 (
talk)
08:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails GNG. My university database search turned up some articles written by her, but none about her. My google BEFORE is showing websites with only self-provided information and standard author bios from non-independent entities. -
Indy beetle (
talk)
09:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete no indication this subject meets notability per Indy bettle's review. Not every academic who has published something is notable. Even without odd edit history and the evident subject wanting this article gone, we have no good reason to keep it.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
18:50, 31 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This article has come to my attention when
User:Ppainter, who claims to be Trevor herself, wanted this page deleted for misinformation. An
A7 speedy request was
declined due to her "publishing multiple works in university press editions". I disagree; I think the article does not qualify for
WP:GNG nor
WP:AUTHOR. ~~
lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me •
contribs)
20:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:TNT. Due to the problematic edit history, even if this is a notable topic it would be better to completely start over. That said, I found zero significant coverage of Trevor in my university library search in terms of reviews of her work or works about her; although she does appear to be cited to some extent in the works of other academics. It’s not clear to me that she would pass
WP:NAUTHOR,
WP:NACADEMIC, or
WP:GNG.
4meter4 (
talk)
08:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails GNG. My university database search turned up some articles written by her, but none about her. My google BEFORE is showing websites with only self-provided information and standard author bios from non-independent entities. -
Indy beetle (
talk)
09:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete no indication this subject meets notability per Indy bettle's review. Not every academic who has published something is notable. Even without odd edit history and the evident subject wanting this article gone, we have no good reason to keep it.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
18:50, 31 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.