The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non notable retail store, There's 3 cites about it going in to administration but other than that there's nothing, As it went in to administration in 2001 I'd imagine there may be a few sources offline however that's just a guess - There may be no sources offline whatsoever, Anyway fails GNG –
Davey2010Talk17:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete at best as my searches have found nothing particularly better at all and there's nothing else convincing there would be the depth of solidity.
SwisterTwistertalk21:45, 9 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete: A former electrical goods retail operation, about which the given references document a familiar cycle of boosting expansion (suggestive article about seeking market funding) then administration when they ran out of cash struggling to compete (
Daily Mail 2001 – via
HighBeam(subscription required) ). Nothing here suggests encyclopaedic notability for this company whose height seems to have been to be 5th largest in its local sector. For me, any identifiable coverage is routine and fails
WP:CORPDEPTH and
WP:GNG.
AllyD (
talk)
07:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non notable retail store, There's 3 cites about it going in to administration but other than that there's nothing, As it went in to administration in 2001 I'd imagine there may be a few sources offline however that's just a guess - There may be no sources offline whatsoever, Anyway fails GNG –
Davey2010Talk17:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete at best as my searches have found nothing particularly better at all and there's nothing else convincing there would be the depth of solidity.
SwisterTwistertalk21:45, 9 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete: A former electrical goods retail operation, about which the given references document a familiar cycle of boosting expansion (suggestive article about seeking market funding) then administration when they ran out of cash struggling to compete (
Daily Mail 2001 – via
HighBeam(subscription required) ). Nothing here suggests encyclopaedic notability for this company whose height seems to have been to be 5th largest in its local sector. For me, any identifiable coverage is routine and fails
WP:CORPDEPTH and
WP:GNG.
AllyD (
talk)
07:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.