- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn after sources provided, with no editors arguing for deletion. ~ mazca talk 17:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Telikin ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to meet the requirements of GNG. A few sources that pretty much review every computer reviewed this one, [1] [2] [3] but IMO that isn't enough. Guy Macon ( talk) 06:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Guy Macon ( talk) 06:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 10:21, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I saw an advertisement for this product in 2012 and figured I could help by writing a Wikipedia article to go with it. I had no need or intent of buying a Telikin PC for myself or my parents and have not been able to contribute meaningfully to the article since then. I realize this comment adds little to the discussion. But I wanted to at least say something to avoid the impression that "even the article creator has abandoned it" and the like. — Soap — 13:39, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Significant product reviews in prominent reliable sources: [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. I'm not clear why the nom considers this insufficient. ~ Kvng ( talk) 15:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawing Nomination. The next time a closer sweeps through the AfDs this should be closed as "withdrawn". -- Guy Macon ( talk) 15:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn after sources provided, with no editors arguing for deletion. ~ mazca talk 17:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Telikin ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to meet the requirements of GNG. A few sources that pretty much review every computer reviewed this one, [1] [2] [3] but IMO that isn't enough. Guy Macon ( talk) 06:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Guy Macon ( talk) 06:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 10:21, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I saw an advertisement for this product in 2012 and figured I could help by writing a Wikipedia article to go with it. I had no need or intent of buying a Telikin PC for myself or my parents and have not been able to contribute meaningfully to the article since then. I realize this comment adds little to the discussion. But I wanted to at least say something to avoid the impression that "even the article creator has abandoned it" and the like. — Soap — 13:39, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Significant product reviews in prominent reliable sources: [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. I'm not clear why the nom considers this insufficient. ~ Kvng ( talk) 15:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawing Nomination. The next time a closer sweeps through the AfDs this should be closed as "withdrawn". -- Guy Macon ( talk) 15:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.