- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Randykitty ( talk) 17:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Television Oita ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Current sourcing includes zero in-depth coverage. Was redirected to Nippon News Network, but that was challenged, while more sources were added, they were simply more of the same db entries and brief mentions. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:52, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Japan. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:55, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Current sources are enough to support the article. More than 3 independent sources ( Fuji TV, Nippon TV, MIC, JBA), and covered the contents mentioned in the article. Onel5969 can't provide any evidence to support that current sources are not in-depth coverage. Onel5969 often deleted or merged articles that were sufficiently sourced and without any discussion. This behavior is not constructive, and very harmful for the collaborative culture of Wikipedia.-- Suicasmo ( talk) 14:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Delete. There is very little in the way of assertions of importance here. As it is, this comes close to meeting the requirements for an A7 deletion. Bensci54 ( talk) 17:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - No English sources are going to be found for this one due to it being a regional Japanese channel. There's multiple sources listed and it's clearly notable due to being a station that many people could watch. It also has 3 other wiki pages, so we know there's notability. KatoKungLee ( talk) 03:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - Based on a review of WP:NBROADCAST I have come to the conclusion that merely stating that it is a regional TV station can be considered assertion of importance, so I am revising my opinion to Keep. Bensci54 ( talk) 17:39, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Randykitty ( talk) 17:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Television Oita ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Current sourcing includes zero in-depth coverage. Was redirected to Nippon News Network, but that was challenged, while more sources were added, they were simply more of the same db entries and brief mentions. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:52, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Japan. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:55, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Current sources are enough to support the article. More than 3 independent sources ( Fuji TV, Nippon TV, MIC, JBA), and covered the contents mentioned in the article. Onel5969 can't provide any evidence to support that current sources are not in-depth coverage. Onel5969 often deleted or merged articles that were sufficiently sourced and without any discussion. This behavior is not constructive, and very harmful for the collaborative culture of Wikipedia.-- Suicasmo ( talk) 14:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Delete. There is very little in the way of assertions of importance here. As it is, this comes close to meeting the requirements for an A7 deletion. Bensci54 ( talk) 17:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - No English sources are going to be found for this one due to it being a regional Japanese channel. There's multiple sources listed and it's clearly notable due to being a station that many people could watch. It also has 3 other wiki pages, so we know there's notability. KatoKungLee ( talk) 03:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - Based on a review of WP:NBROADCAST I have come to the conclusion that merely stating that it is a regional TV station can be considered assertion of importance, so I am revising my opinion to Keep. Bensci54 ( talk) 17:39, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.