- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Techlogix
AfDs for this article:
- Techlogix ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to pass WP:GNG and WP:NCOMPANY. Its first Afd was long ago. This will through to decide whether the company itself is notable or just the product is notable. Greenbörg (talk) 14:40, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 15:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 15:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. not notable by current standards DGG ( talk ) 18:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete , cited sources are not reliable and independent. -- Saqib ( talk) 03:29, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. The subject of this article is not notable and the sources are not credible. Bmbaker88 ( talk) 20:56, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fail WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. Also if the company name is "Techlogix Pakistan" then that is where this article should reside. -- HighKing ++ 15:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: No evidence of notability. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 14:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Techlogix
AfDs for this article:
- Techlogix ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to pass WP:GNG and WP:NCOMPANY. Its first Afd was long ago. This will through to decide whether the company itself is notable or just the product is notable. Greenbörg (talk) 14:40, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 15:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 15:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. not notable by current standards DGG ( talk ) 18:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete , cited sources are not reliable and independent. -- Saqib ( talk) 03:29, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. The subject of this article is not notable and the sources are not credible. Bmbaker88 ( talk) 20:56, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fail WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. Also if the company name is "Techlogix Pakistan" then that is where this article should reside. -- HighKing ++ 15:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: No evidence of notability. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 14:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.