From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 23:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Tebobonga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a fictitious settlement in Nonouti (it is only a very small house clinic for one nurse). Created with another ones in 2008 from a list of places in this atoll. -- Arorae ( talk) 11:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:24, 25 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:24, 25 August 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Eastmain:: you have a very weird notion of settlement notion: this is only the name of the clinic (Tebobonga Dispensary/clinic: 1 clinic, 2 wards, 2 cooking houses, 2 toilets) and not of a village or a settlement. But perhaps you have no idea about the settlements and kaainga in Kiribati?-- Arorae ( talk) 22:27, 25 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Could not verify the existence of a settlement with this name. The two sources are an entry in a list of medical clinics and a magnetic declination calculator that appears to be bot-generated; these fail the WP:NGEO sourcing requirements which specifically exclude maps and tables from determining notability. Even if this is confirmed to be a settlement, it would fall under Populated places without legal recognition which need to meet GNG per WP:GEOLAND #2. – dlthewave 17:53, 27 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 20:36, 1 September 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 23:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Tebobonga (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a fictitious settlement in Nonouti (it is only a very small house clinic for one nurse). Created with another ones in 2008 from a list of places in this atoll. -- Arorae ( talk) 11:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:24, 25 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:24, 25 August 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Eastmain:: you have a very weird notion of settlement notion: this is only the name of the clinic (Tebobonga Dispensary/clinic: 1 clinic, 2 wards, 2 cooking houses, 2 toilets) and not of a village or a settlement. But perhaps you have no idea about the settlements and kaainga in Kiribati?-- Arorae ( talk) 22:27, 25 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Could not verify the existence of a settlement with this name. The two sources are an entry in a list of medical clinics and a magnetic declination calculator that appears to be bot-generated; these fail the WP:NGEO sourcing requirements which specifically exclude maps and tables from determining notability. Even if this is confirmed to be a settlement, it would fall under Populated places without legal recognition which need to meet GNG per WP:GEOLAND #2. – dlthewave 17:53, 27 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 20:36, 1 September 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook