The result was delete. The consensus is to delete. I was considering a merger, but no suitable target was agreed on by the contributors to the discussion. Should anyone want to consider this, you might want to start a discussion on the talk page of one or both Tea ceremony or The Book of Tea. If consensus can be reached there, this article can be userfied to allow for a merger. PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 00:58, 24 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The article is largely about The Book of Tea, which introduced the term "teaism." Nothing else in the article is sourced--this is just a collection of comments about various topics. The material on dao/do is incomprehensible. A google search on teaism gives many hits to a Washington DC restaurant, and some references to The Book of Tea, but little evidence for independent notability. And this article makes no case for independent notability. To the extent that there is any unique, sourced material in this article, recommend merge with The Book of Tea. Logical Cowboy ( talk) 17:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Note Could I just point out that there is more voting/discussion here?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Teaism
Logical Cowboy ( talk) 02:05, 15 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The consensus is to delete. I was considering a merger, but no suitable target was agreed on by the contributors to the discussion. Should anyone want to consider this, you might want to start a discussion on the talk page of one or both Tea ceremony or The Book of Tea. If consensus can be reached there, this article can be userfied to allow for a merger. PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 00:58, 24 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The article is largely about The Book of Tea, which introduced the term "teaism." Nothing else in the article is sourced--this is just a collection of comments about various topics. The material on dao/do is incomprehensible. A google search on teaism gives many hits to a Washington DC restaurant, and some references to The Book of Tea, but little evidence for independent notability. And this article makes no case for independent notability. To the extent that there is any unique, sourced material in this article, recommend merge with The Book of Tea. Logical Cowboy ( talk) 17:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Note Could I just point out that there is more voting/discussion here?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Teaism
Logical Cowboy ( talk) 02:05, 15 February 2011 (UTC) reply