The result was merge to List of minor DC Comics characters. v/r - T P 22:36, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. The fictional characters as a topic do not have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, so they do not not meet the general notability guideline. There are no reliable secondary sources that give reception or significance to the fictional characters, so any article about them can only be a plot-only description of a fictional work and an indiscriminate collection of information. Of the cited sources within the article, only one provides analytic and evaluative claims, but these claims are not about the characters, they are for the comic book, which is reviewed in the provided source, with no claims for any of the fictional characters. Even so, a single source is no evidence of significant coverage. A quick search engine test does not show anything different to presume that the three characters, either alone or in group, deserve a stand-alone article. Jfgslo ( talk) 22:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List of minor DC Comics characters. v/r - T P 22:36, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. The fictional characters as a topic do not have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, so they do not not meet the general notability guideline. There are no reliable secondary sources that give reception or significance to the fictional characters, so any article about them can only be a plot-only description of a fictional work and an indiscriminate collection of information. Of the cited sources within the article, only one provides analytic and evaluative claims, but these claims are not about the characters, they are for the comic book, which is reviewed in the provided source, with no claims for any of the fictional characters. Even so, a single source is no evidence of significant coverage. A quick search engine test does not show anything different to presume that the three characters, either alone or in group, deserve a stand-alone article. Jfgslo ( talk) 22:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC) reply