- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:19, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Tanzeel Akhtar
- Tanzeel Akhtar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is about a journalist who contributes journalism, References all say that this is what she does but there is nothing here to indicate that any others believe that she is notable. Could be an autobiography, but it still isn't notable. Searches reveal more of the same - the subject writes articles, nobody writes about her. Looks like yet another attempt to big-up crypto currencies. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 16:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - Disagree with Velella's comments - the subject Tanzeel Akhtar has been quoted in the press for her analysis on cryptocurrencies and is considered a credible spokesperson on the subject matter discussion regulation and blockchain. See the links: [1] [2] [3] [4]: CryptoScribbler ( talk) 20:58, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Article is supported by examples of subject's work and some quotes. Fails to provide in-depth, non-trivial support that establishes notability. reddogsix ( talk) 12:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:19, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Tanzeel Akhtar
- Tanzeel Akhtar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is about a journalist who contributes journalism, References all say that this is what she does but there is nothing here to indicate that any others believe that she is notable. Could be an autobiography, but it still isn't notable. Searches reveal more of the same - the subject writes articles, nobody writes about her. Looks like yet another attempt to big-up crypto currencies. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 16:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - Disagree with Velella's comments - the subject Tanzeel Akhtar has been quoted in the press for her analysis on cryptocurrencies and is considered a credible spokesperson on the subject matter discussion regulation and blockchain. See the links: [1] [2] [3] [4]: CryptoScribbler ( talk) 20:58, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Article is supported by examples of subject's work and some quotes. Fails to provide in-depth, non-trivial support that establishes notability. reddogsix ( talk) 12:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.