The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Seriously??? Just because the subject is mentioned in an article does not mean it has significant coverage. Simply clicking on those links and declaring "there are search results, it must be notable" does not actually establish notability.--
Rusf10 (
talk)
18:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)reply
If you're going to throw out terms like "abundant coverage", it would be helpful to actually point to those sources. The only source in the article right now is
[1], that's not independent. All I can find is several Newsday articles that just happen to mention the park, which I'd hardly consider abundant coverage.--
Rusf10 (
talk)
03:00, 3 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete I see the same results as JPL: passing references to a place where routine things happen, but nothing substantial about the park.
Mangoe (
talk)
17:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Seriously??? Just because the subject is mentioned in an article does not mean it has significant coverage. Simply clicking on those links and declaring "there are search results, it must be notable" does not actually establish notability.--
Rusf10 (
talk)
18:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)reply
If you're going to throw out terms like "abundant coverage", it would be helpful to actually point to those sources. The only source in the article right now is
[1], that's not independent. All I can find is several Newsday articles that just happen to mention the park, which I'd hardly consider abundant coverage.--
Rusf10 (
talk)
03:00, 3 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete I see the same results as JPL: passing references to a place where routine things happen, but nothing substantial about the park.
Mangoe (
talk)
17:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.