- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Tana Goertz ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD removed without explanation, and without the addition of reliable sources. This is a minor, way minor celebrity, who apparently speaks for Trump sometimes, and had a career that does not make her notable in her own right. Does not pass GNG, does not pass politicians' guidelines. Drmies ( talk) 00:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 04:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 04:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 04:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete She has not garnered enough coverage as either a Trump campaign spokesperson or a reality TV personality to be considered notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 06:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 06:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as by far only seasonal notability with noting actually being convincing aside from those apparent events and thus nothing to suggest there would be anything else enhancing for solid notability. SwisterTwister talk 02:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Tana Goertz ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD removed without explanation, and without the addition of reliable sources. This is a minor, way minor celebrity, who apparently speaks for Trump sometimes, and had a career that does not make her notable in her own right. Does not pass GNG, does not pass politicians' guidelines. Drmies ( talk) 00:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 04:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 04:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 04:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete She has not garnered enough coverage as either a Trump campaign spokesperson or a reality TV personality to be considered notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 06:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 06:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as by far only seasonal notability with noting actually being convincing aside from those apparent events and thus nothing to suggest there would be anything else enhancing for solid notability. SwisterTwister talk 02:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.