- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. However, cleanup is in order to make sure it meets our standards. (non-admin closure) → Call me Razr Nation 09:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Tan Khoon Yong
- Tan Khoon Yong ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advertisement, no evidence of notability. Mys_721tx ( talk) 11:55, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. ssт✈ (discuss) 17:20, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Subject appears to be notable from a simple search but the article could definitely use a trimming of promotional tone because it reads like an advertisement. Meatsgains ( talk) 03:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I've re-organized the article for better flow and a less promotional tone. From some brief research he seems to be notable in his field. I've added some information from an (glowing) article about his kids following him into the business, and additional information from an (critical) article about fengshui retailers ripping people off by having them buy overpriced junk, and both of those are now cited. I've also found this article, [1] which is not in English, and which I haven't cited; but from what I can tell from Google translate, various Fengshui masters (including Tan Khoon Yong) were consulted about a Las Vegas casino, and are giving their opinions about if it has good or bad fengshui. I can't make enough sense out of it to be able to use it in the article, but it's evidence of notability. He's also briefly discussed in this book. [2] Again, appears to be notable. Someone needs to verify the information about the French TV show appearance, that link is dead, and the article could use attention by someone who can read whatever language that article about the hotel is in, but he does seem to be notable, so Keep. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 20:07, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
References
- ^ năm, Thứ (22 September 2011). "Tranh cãi về phong thủy của Marina Bay Sand". ngoisao. Retrieved 18 December 2015.
- ^ Hellriegel, Don; Slocum, John (5 March 2008). Organizational Behavior. South-Western College Pub. p. 70. ISBN 978-0324578720. Retrieved 18 December 2015.
- Delete for now as despite what's listed including above, my searches found no better coverage, especially considering what's currently listed at the article, aside from a few links at Books, News and browsers. The article may have some information but there's nothing solidly and outstandingly notable and acceptable, that is, unless the article can be further improved. SwisterTwister talk 08:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 20:36, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 20:36, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dat Guy Talk Contribs 12:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dat Guy Talk Contribs 12:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Needs cleanup and additional sources, but deletion is not a solution for that. Thisisnotatest ( talk) 23:14, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. However, cleanup is in order to make sure it meets our standards. (non-admin closure) → Call me Razr Nation 09:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Tan Khoon Yong
- Tan Khoon Yong ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advertisement, no evidence of notability. Mys_721tx ( talk) 11:55, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. ssт✈ (discuss) 17:20, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Subject appears to be notable from a simple search but the article could definitely use a trimming of promotional tone because it reads like an advertisement. Meatsgains ( talk) 03:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I've re-organized the article for better flow and a less promotional tone. From some brief research he seems to be notable in his field. I've added some information from an (glowing) article about his kids following him into the business, and additional information from an (critical) article about fengshui retailers ripping people off by having them buy overpriced junk, and both of those are now cited. I've also found this article, [1] which is not in English, and which I haven't cited; but from what I can tell from Google translate, various Fengshui masters (including Tan Khoon Yong) were consulted about a Las Vegas casino, and are giving their opinions about if it has good or bad fengshui. I can't make enough sense out of it to be able to use it in the article, but it's evidence of notability. He's also briefly discussed in this book. [2] Again, appears to be notable. Someone needs to verify the information about the French TV show appearance, that link is dead, and the article could use attention by someone who can read whatever language that article about the hotel is in, but he does seem to be notable, so Keep. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 20:07, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
References
- ^ năm, Thứ (22 September 2011). "Tranh cãi về phong thủy của Marina Bay Sand". ngoisao. Retrieved 18 December 2015.
- ^ Hellriegel, Don; Slocum, John (5 March 2008). Organizational Behavior. South-Western College Pub. p. 70. ISBN 978-0324578720. Retrieved 18 December 2015.
- Delete for now as despite what's listed including above, my searches found no better coverage, especially considering what's currently listed at the article, aside from a few links at Books, News and browsers. The article may have some information but there's nothing solidly and outstandingly notable and acceptable, that is, unless the article can be further improved. SwisterTwister talk 08:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 20:36, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 20:36, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dat Guy Talk Contribs 12:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dat Guy Talk Contribs 12:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Needs cleanup and additional sources, but deletion is not a solution for that. Thisisnotatest ( talk) 23:14, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.