The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A search does not turn up sufficient references for it to pass
WP:NCORP. While their game Radial-G is obviously notable, the studio is not, and notability is not inherited per
WP:INHERIT. ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 04:45, 28 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Considering the article is a possible
WP:COI, I believed any redirect I made might be reverted and I would be forced to do an AFD, so I decided to pre-empt that by simply doing an AFD. Also, I don't really believe it's a plausible redirect, being an extremely small indie studio.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 14:34, 28 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. I speedied this as an unremarkable business, but the tag was removed by the article creator.
TheLongTone (
talk) 14:17, 29 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Radial-G. All relevant
video game reliable sourcescustom Google search coverage is about the game, thus the company's title should redirect there as a common search phrase. Try redirecting (even if it means being reverted) before coming to AfD. The redirect is plausible as long as any reader is likely to search for the phrase. czar 20:03, 29 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(
c) (
m) 18:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A search does not turn up sufficient references for it to pass
WP:NCORP. While their game Radial-G is obviously notable, the studio is not, and notability is not inherited per
WP:INHERIT. ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 04:45, 28 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Considering the article is a possible
WP:COI, I believed any redirect I made might be reverted and I would be forced to do an AFD, so I decided to pre-empt that by simply doing an AFD. Also, I don't really believe it's a plausible redirect, being an extremely small indie studio.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 14:34, 28 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. I speedied this as an unremarkable business, but the tag was removed by the article creator.
TheLongTone (
talk) 14:17, 29 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Radial-G. All relevant
video game reliable sourcescustom Google search coverage is about the game, thus the company's title should redirect there as a common search phrase. Try redirecting (even if it means being reverted) before coming to AfD. The redirect is plausible as long as any reader is likely to search for the phrase. czar 20:03, 29 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(
c) (
m) 18:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.