- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Draftify.. Liz Read! Talk! 03:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Tamara Aihie
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tamara Aihie ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only passing mentions in sources, does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV Hughesdarren ( talk) 05:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: per nomination. No significant sources are listed. StartOkayStop ( talk) 05:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Not meeting notability guidelines Proton Dental ( talk) 06:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, no appropriate sources coming up on Google, Wayback, or other databases. Does not meet any other criteria. MaxnaCarta ( talk) 08:51, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Actors and filmmakers,
Women, and
Nigeria.
Shellwood (
talk)
08:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment
WP:CREATIVE is satisfied if someone plays a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known piece of work. She appears to be the writer for two notable pieces of work, so if she is, that seems to make her meet criterion 3 twice. I said "comment" rather than "strong keep" because I see three deletes and I am not skilled in Nigerian source assessment. Can anyone comment on the quality of the sourcing? Is that why people above voted delete?
CT55555 (
talk)
11:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Wikiproject Africa maintains an
Africa Sources List and Wikiproject Nigeria has suggestions at
WP:NGRS.
Beccaynr (
talk)
18:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- The article sourcing is from quality and reliable sources according to the lists on WP:NGRS. Aderiqueza ( talk) 11:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Wikiproject Africa maintains an
Africa Sources List and Wikiproject Nigeria has suggestions at
WP:NGRS.
Beccaynr (
talk)
18:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment
WP:CREATIVE is satisfied if someone plays a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known piece of work. She appears to be the writer for two notable pieces of work, so if she is, that seems to make her meet criterion 3 twice. I said "comment" rather than "strong keep" because I see three deletes and I am not skilled in Nigerian source assessment. Can anyone comment on the quality of the sourcing? Is that why people above voted delete?
CT55555 (
talk)
11:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
*::::Keep, based on her co-creation of two well-known pieces of work and the assertion above that the sources are reliable.
CT55555 (
talk)
11:40, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: This articles was created as part of an edit-a-thon training new editors to contribute to African-cinema related content on Wikipedia organized by the institution where I am currently Wikipedian in Residence. I noticed from the event dashboard that this article was created by a new editor who should learn more and should be encouraged. I have advised and cautioned them and other participants. We have earlier warned about mere mentions and taught about many of what is being violated here.
- We may move this to draft rather than delete if it is considered for deletion. Thanks for keeping up Wikipedia's standards. Danidamiobi ( talk) 19:23, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- Draftify The article includes the generally unreliable source BellaNaija (per WP:NGRS) and WP:IMDB (per WP:RSP), which should be removed. Several sources appear to be recycled press releases or otherwise nonindependent announcements of On the Real ( National Daily, The Nation, Tribune The Guardian), instead of independent reviews or other reporting or commentary after its release that could help support notability. However, the context of how she is discussed in Pulse indicates the potential for notability to be further supported in the future. Beccaynr ( talk) 02:34, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:32, 24 July 2022 (UTC)- Draftify I scored out my keep as my vote hinges on the quality of the sources, which I'm unsure about and relying on others. I find the argument to drafity convincing and seems like a good WP:ATD CT55555 ( talk) 21:54, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete or Draftify may be TOOSOON BIG BURLEY 17:14, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Draftify.. Liz Read! Talk! 03:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Tamara Aihie
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tamara Aihie ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only passing mentions in sources, does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV Hughesdarren ( talk) 05:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: per nomination. No significant sources are listed. StartOkayStop ( talk) 05:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Not meeting notability guidelines Proton Dental ( talk) 06:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, no appropriate sources coming up on Google, Wayback, or other databases. Does not meet any other criteria. MaxnaCarta ( talk) 08:51, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Actors and filmmakers,
Women, and
Nigeria.
Shellwood (
talk)
08:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment
WP:CREATIVE is satisfied if someone plays a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known piece of work. She appears to be the writer for two notable pieces of work, so if she is, that seems to make her meet criterion 3 twice. I said "comment" rather than "strong keep" because I see three deletes and I am not skilled in Nigerian source assessment. Can anyone comment on the quality of the sourcing? Is that why people above voted delete?
CT55555 (
talk)
11:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Wikiproject Africa maintains an
Africa Sources List and Wikiproject Nigeria has suggestions at
WP:NGRS.
Beccaynr (
talk)
18:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- The article sourcing is from quality and reliable sources according to the lists on WP:NGRS. Aderiqueza ( talk) 11:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Wikiproject Africa maintains an
Africa Sources List and Wikiproject Nigeria has suggestions at
WP:NGRS.
Beccaynr (
talk)
18:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment
WP:CREATIVE is satisfied if someone plays a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known piece of work. She appears to be the writer for two notable pieces of work, so if she is, that seems to make her meet criterion 3 twice. I said "comment" rather than "strong keep" because I see three deletes and I am not skilled in Nigerian source assessment. Can anyone comment on the quality of the sourcing? Is that why people above voted delete?
CT55555 (
talk)
11:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
*::::Keep, based on her co-creation of two well-known pieces of work and the assertion above that the sources are reliable.
CT55555 (
talk)
11:40, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: This articles was created as part of an edit-a-thon training new editors to contribute to African-cinema related content on Wikipedia organized by the institution where I am currently Wikipedian in Residence. I noticed from the event dashboard that this article was created by a new editor who should learn more and should be encouraged. I have advised and cautioned them and other participants. We have earlier warned about mere mentions and taught about many of what is being violated here.
- We may move this to draft rather than delete if it is considered for deletion. Thanks for keeping up Wikipedia's standards. Danidamiobi ( talk) 19:23, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- Draftify The article includes the generally unreliable source BellaNaija (per WP:NGRS) and WP:IMDB (per WP:RSP), which should be removed. Several sources appear to be recycled press releases or otherwise nonindependent announcements of On the Real ( National Daily, The Nation, Tribune The Guardian), instead of independent reviews or other reporting or commentary after its release that could help support notability. However, the context of how she is discussed in Pulse indicates the potential for notability to be further supported in the future. Beccaynr ( talk) 02:34, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:32, 24 July 2022 (UTC)- Draftify I scored out my keep as my vote hinges on the quality of the sources, which I'm unsure about and relying on others. I find the argument to drafity convincing and seems like a good WP:ATD CT55555 ( talk) 21:54, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete or Draftify may be TOOSOON BIG BURLEY 17:14, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.