- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Samworth Brothers. Also, not sure what a "non-notable source" is supposed to be; sources are the things that can establish notability of another topic, the notability of a source itself is a wholly different topic and none of these things implies the other. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Tamar Foods
- Tamar Foods ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to only reference non-notable sources (as good as Pig World magazine is) or simply has passing mentions. WP:BEFORE showed much the same. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 00:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 04:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 04:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Merge with Samworth Brothers. No indications that Tamar Foods is independently notable, fails WP:NCORP. -- HighKing ++ 11:51, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:31, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Merge to Samworth Brothers. But keep Ginsters separate. Andy Dingley ( talk) 16:36, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Aside Since when was The Grocer a " non-notable source"? (reliable source?) This is the premier trade journal of the food trade. Just where else is a better source for food industry coverage? Andy Dingley ( talk) 19:14, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Samworth Brothers. Also, not sure what a "non-notable source" is supposed to be; sources are the things that can establish notability of another topic, the notability of a source itself is a wholly different topic and none of these things implies the other. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Tamar Foods
- Tamar Foods ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to only reference non-notable sources (as good as Pig World magazine is) or simply has passing mentions. WP:BEFORE showed much the same. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 00:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 04:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 04:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Merge with Samworth Brothers. No indications that Tamar Foods is independently notable, fails WP:NCORP. -- HighKing ++ 11:51, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:31, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Merge to Samworth Brothers. But keep Ginsters separate. Andy Dingley ( talk) 16:36, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Aside Since when was The Grocer a " non-notable source"? (reliable source?) This is the premier trade journal of the food trade. Just where else is a better source for food industry coverage? Andy Dingley ( talk) 19:14, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.