- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy redirect to Takatika Grit. Nom accepted/applied redirect; fixing closure. (non-admin closure) — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 10:24, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Takatika Grit theropod
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Takatika Grit theropod ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. The name "Takatika Grit theropod" never used in the literature. The remains from the deposit are not suggested to represent a single taxon and therefore the term "Takatika Grit theropod" is a misnomer and WP:OR. As far as I am aware, individual fossils not part of a named species fail the GNG unless they are especially significant, like the Gurlin Tsav skull. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 19:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 19:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
DeleteMerge/redirect - see below. Agree with nom; this article including its title is an interpretation of various publications, but does not represent a recognized (or even single) thing. Takatika Grit as a lagerstaette (I gather) would probably make a good article, and that's where I would merge this to. But in absence of such an article - delete. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 23:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- @
Elmidae: there is currently a
Draft:Takatika Grit that was previously declined due to a lack of refs, but these have since been added, do you think the content should be merged there?
Hemiauchenia (
talk) 23:41, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- @
Hemiauchenia: There we go; looks like a reasonable draft. Yes, I'd suggest jumping that out of the queue and merging to it. --
Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs) 01:36, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Moved Takatika Grit to mainspace, cleaned up a little. Actually I think there's little merging to be done, the salient points (and the refs) are already in the table - just redirect? -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 14:02, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- @
Hemiauchenia: There we go; looks like a reasonable draft. Yes, I'd suggest jumping that out of the queue and merging to it. --
Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs) 01:36, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy redirect to Takatika Grit. Nom accepted/applied redirect; fixing closure. (non-admin closure) — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 10:24, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Takatika Grit theropod
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Takatika Grit theropod ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. The name "Takatika Grit theropod" never used in the literature. The remains from the deposit are not suggested to represent a single taxon and therefore the term "Takatika Grit theropod" is a misnomer and WP:OR. As far as I am aware, individual fossils not part of a named species fail the GNG unless they are especially significant, like the Gurlin Tsav skull. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 19:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 19:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
DeleteMerge/redirect - see below. Agree with nom; this article including its title is an interpretation of various publications, but does not represent a recognized (or even single) thing. Takatika Grit as a lagerstaette (I gather) would probably make a good article, and that's where I would merge this to. But in absence of such an article - delete. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 23:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- @
Elmidae: there is currently a
Draft:Takatika Grit that was previously declined due to a lack of refs, but these have since been added, do you think the content should be merged there?
Hemiauchenia (
talk) 23:41, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- @
Hemiauchenia: There we go; looks like a reasonable draft. Yes, I'd suggest jumping that out of the queue and merging to it. --
Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs) 01:36, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Moved Takatika Grit to mainspace, cleaned up a little. Actually I think there's little merging to be done, the salient points (and the refs) are already in the table - just redirect? -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 14:02, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- @
Hemiauchenia: There we go; looks like a reasonable draft. Yes, I'd suggest jumping that out of the queue and merging to it. --
Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs) 01:36, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.