- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 20:50, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Taiwanese independence referendum, 2019
- Taiwanese independence referendum, 2019 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The referendum is only a proposal, not a definite event. This therefore fails WP:CRYSTAL Daduxing ( talk) 16:18, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:CRYSTAL as not a scheduled referendum yet. However, the article was already prodded, so not sure why it was taken to AfD? Number 5 7 16:25, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- If delete; Re-draftify instead so that the article can be made up to scratch in the event it does go ahead — IVORK Discuss 01:27, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Redrafitfy per IVORK. ToThAc ( talk) 19:04, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Do note that source 1 links to source 2 which means there is only 1 source. 'But holding such a referendum envisioned faces a major hurdle. Though Taiwan's Referendum Act was amended in December 2017 to allow lower thresholds for initiating and passing referendum questions, questions related to constitutional issues, including sovereignty issues, still cannot be decided through referendums." - source 2 will indicate that this fails WP:CRYSTAL. I will say draft will go no end as this will not happen anytime soon as clear threshold is still not met and will most likely into draft for too long. The draft will simply be a permanent draft. I would add that WP:NOTNEWS will also apply. delete as per norm will be better. (Cavaet: If some editor can find more sources / reactions or etc to make it notable) -- Quek157 ( talk) 19:45, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 20:50, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Taiwanese independence referendum, 2019
- Taiwanese independence referendum, 2019 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The referendum is only a proposal, not a definite event. This therefore fails WP:CRYSTAL Daduxing ( talk) 16:18, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:CRYSTAL as not a scheduled referendum yet. However, the article was already prodded, so not sure why it was taken to AfD? Number 5 7 16:25, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- If delete; Re-draftify instead so that the article can be made up to scratch in the event it does go ahead — IVORK Discuss 01:27, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Redrafitfy per IVORK. ToThAc ( talk) 19:04, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Do note that source 1 links to source 2 which means there is only 1 source. 'But holding such a referendum envisioned faces a major hurdle. Though Taiwan's Referendum Act was amended in December 2017 to allow lower thresholds for initiating and passing referendum questions, questions related to constitutional issues, including sovereignty issues, still cannot be decided through referendums." - source 2 will indicate that this fails WP:CRYSTAL. I will say draft will go no end as this will not happen anytime soon as clear threshold is still not met and will most likely into draft for too long. The draft will simply be a permanent draft. I would add that WP:NOTNEWS will also apply. delete as per norm will be better. (Cavaet: If some editor can find more sources / reactions or etc to make it notable) -- Quek157 ( talk) 19:45, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.