The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Classic case of there simply being nothing else aside from that one event, the PROD was simply removed with the apparent basis that extra sources would help but it's nowhere close to convincing. Notifying
Deborahjay who also commented at the talk page.
SwisterTwistertalk 23:17, 15 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep I'm open to hearing opposing arguments but the coverage of this has been extensive, world-wide. Some sources in addition to what's already in the entry:
I also saw sources in German, Italian, Spanish and Turkish, but others are probably better qualified to assess those than I.
Perhaps the best solution is simply to change the name of the entry to something like Tair Kaminsky Conscientious Objection or something else to indicate the focus on the event rather than a true biography. In any case I don't think Wikipedia is served by deleting.
Innisfree987 (
talk) 18:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep- Per
WP:BIO1E, if media coverage of both the event and the individual's role grow larger, separate articles may become justified. Apart from the links mentioned above the subject has been covered by major news agencies such
Independent UK,
Associated Press,
Yahoo news,
Jerusalem Post and there are many more. I guess inclusion of this article to an encyclopedia is going to be more meaningful than deletion.
Hitro talk 19:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep-keep: as
user:hitroMilanese said, In addition this title "was the longest held female conscientious objector" that published by media make her notable.
Lstfllw203 (
talk) 18:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Classic case of there simply being nothing else aside from that one event, the PROD was simply removed with the apparent basis that extra sources would help but it's nowhere close to convincing. Notifying
Deborahjay who also commented at the talk page.
SwisterTwistertalk 23:17, 15 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep I'm open to hearing opposing arguments but the coverage of this has been extensive, world-wide. Some sources in addition to what's already in the entry:
I also saw sources in German, Italian, Spanish and Turkish, but others are probably better qualified to assess those than I.
Perhaps the best solution is simply to change the name of the entry to something like Tair Kaminsky Conscientious Objection or something else to indicate the focus on the event rather than a true biography. In any case I don't think Wikipedia is served by deleting.
Innisfree987 (
talk) 18:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep- Per
WP:BIO1E, if media coverage of both the event and the individual's role grow larger, separate articles may become justified. Apart from the links mentioned above the subject has been covered by major news agencies such
Independent UK,
Associated Press,
Yahoo news,
Jerusalem Post and there are many more. I guess inclusion of this article to an encyclopedia is going to be more meaningful than deletion.
Hitro talk 19:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep-keep: as
user:hitroMilanese said, In addition this title "was the longest held female conscientious objector" that published by media make her notable.
Lstfllw203 (
talk) 18:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.