The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This is an article about an individual Hong Kong
station identification over the years. There is no indication of notability, and Google searches do not show any obvious signs of notability, either. The article itself is composed of a series of citations to YouTube, original research, and excessive detail. There really is
nothing to merge to the parent article, as there is no reliably sourced text.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 17:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, §
FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete – Very little content is sourced, and all of the sources are Youtube. Also, it doesn't meet notability (by a long shot).
United States Man (
talk) 03:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This is an article about an individual Hong Kong
station identification over the years. There is no indication of notability, and Google searches do not show any obvious signs of notability, either. The article itself is composed of a series of citations to YouTube, original research, and excessive detail. There really is
nothing to merge to the parent article, as there is no reliably sourced text.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 17:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, §
FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete – Very little content is sourced, and all of the sources are Youtube. Also, it doesn't meet notability (by a long shot).
United States Man (
talk) 03:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.