- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
TJ The Frenchie
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- TJ The Frenchie ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It pains me greatly to be taking an article about such an obviously very good boy to AfD, but based on my search, he does not meet WP:GNG. The only editorial coverage I came across was from Kent Life, a local newspaper. JSFarman ( talk) 05:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 09:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. I did not find significant coverage in reliable sources about the subject in my searches for sources. I found a 6 March 2020 article in the Swindon Advertiser that discusses a two-year-old Frenchie-cross-American bulldog named TJ. But this Wikipedia article says TJ the Frenchie was born 19 March 2021, so this would be a different TJ. The subject does not meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. Cunard ( talk) 10:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Could not find independent and reliable SIGCOV about the subject. Seems to fail WP:GNG. Tutwakhamoe ( talk) 12:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
TJ The Frenchie
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- TJ The Frenchie ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It pains me greatly to be taking an article about such an obviously very good boy to AfD, but based on my search, he does not meet WP:GNG. The only editorial coverage I came across was from Kent Life, a local newspaper. JSFarman ( talk) 05:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 09:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. I did not find significant coverage in reliable sources about the subject in my searches for sources. I found a 6 March 2020 article in the Swindon Advertiser that discusses a two-year-old Frenchie-cross-American bulldog named TJ. But this Wikipedia article says TJ the Frenchie was born 19 March 2021, so this would be a different TJ. The subject does not meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. Cunard ( talk) 10:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Could not find independent and reliable SIGCOV about the subject. Seems to fail WP:GNG. Tutwakhamoe ( talk) 12:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.