- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Not much discussion here, so calling this WP:SOFTDELETE -- RoySmith (talk) 11:27, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
System Design and Management (MIT)
- System Design and Management (MIT) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article topic does not appear to meet the threshold for notability. A brief search indicates trivial and primary mentions, and no reliable sources covering the program in-depth. Izno ( talk) 18:49, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - GretLomborg ( talk) 22:12, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Not much discussion here, so calling this WP:SOFTDELETE -- RoySmith (talk) 11:27, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
System Design and Management (MIT)
- System Design and Management (MIT) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article topic does not appear to meet the threshold for notability. A brief search indicates trivial and primary mentions, and no reliable sources covering the program in-depth. Izno ( talk) 18:49, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - GretLomborg ( talk) 22:12, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.