The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Per A7 and G11.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk) 10:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Defunct company, no notability. The only references within the article are to the dead website of the company. No coverage in independent sources.
DferDaisy (
talk) 23:53, 15 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. -
DferDaisy Please just flag it speedy delete. We don't need to go this route with something clearly not verifiable.
ChalkDrawings33 (
talk) 06:40, 16 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete: Nothing better than Wikipedia mirrors and a download site found in searches. No claim or
evidence of notability. Fails
WP:CORPDEPTH.
AllyD (
talk) 07:04, 16 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete: It's games may or may not be notable (they had a bit more coverage, though probably not suitable reviews) but, of course,
WP:NOTINHERITED applies and there was bupkis all to support Syntasoft.
Nosebagbear (
talk) 10:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof? 10:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Not notable and fails
WP:Corp.
Kierzek (
talk) 13:09, 16 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. I looked for sources on the
WP:VG/RS search and just in general, and I couldn't find squat.
Nomader (
talk) 19:29, 16 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment - Snow - could we get an admin to have a look over, since it seems to be distinctly falling one way, rather than just wait pending a pile on.
Nosebagbear (
talk) 19:58, 16 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Snow Delete Snowball's chance in hell of surviving.
wikitigresito (
talk) 01:51, 17 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Per A7 and G11.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk) 10:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Defunct company, no notability. The only references within the article are to the dead website of the company. No coverage in independent sources.
DferDaisy (
talk) 23:53, 15 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. -
DferDaisy Please just flag it speedy delete. We don't need to go this route with something clearly not verifiable.
ChalkDrawings33 (
talk) 06:40, 16 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete: Nothing better than Wikipedia mirrors and a download site found in searches. No claim or
evidence of notability. Fails
WP:CORPDEPTH.
AllyD (
talk) 07:04, 16 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete: It's games may or may not be notable (they had a bit more coverage, though probably not suitable reviews) but, of course,
WP:NOTINHERITED applies and there was bupkis all to support Syntasoft.
Nosebagbear (
talk) 10:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof? 10:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Not notable and fails
WP:Corp.
Kierzek (
talk) 13:09, 16 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. I looked for sources on the
WP:VG/RS search and just in general, and I couldn't find squat.
Nomader (
talk) 19:29, 16 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment - Snow - could we get an admin to have a look over, since it seems to be distinctly falling one way, rather than just wait pending a pile on.
Nosebagbear (
talk) 19:58, 16 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Snow Delete Snowball's chance in hell of surviving.
wikitigresito (
talk) 01:51, 17 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.