From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 10:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Synergos (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability. google searches for "Synergos" after excluding various websites named "Synergos" (the search prompt I ended up using was "synergos" -synergos.org -synergoscompanies.com -synergoscounseling.com -synergoshealth.com -synergosholdings.com -network.synergos.org -synergos-tech.com -experience.synergos.org -synergosamc.com -synergostech.com -synergosadvice.com -synergos.biz -synergosconsulting.net -synergosvc.com -synergos.ph) produced few sources that would meet Wikipedia's standards for sources, beyond some puff pieces highlighting the supposed exclusivity of Synergos' "Global Philanthropy Circle." The page was created by the Communications Director for Synergos by their own admission (see the article's talk page), so one wouldn't even be able to argue that the organisation was at least notable enough for some Wikipedian to have created it. I recognise that debates over notability, COI, etc have occurred in the past, but disagree on the consensus that was apparently reached at the time. As far as I can tell this is the first time the page has been nominated for deletion outright. CongealedBox ( talk) 05:59, 7 December 2023 (UTC) reply

(Global Philanthropy Circle: Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 10:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Synergos (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability. google searches for "Synergos" after excluding various websites named "Synergos" (the search prompt I ended up using was "synergos" -synergos.org -synergoscompanies.com -synergoscounseling.com -synergoshealth.com -synergosholdings.com -network.synergos.org -synergos-tech.com -experience.synergos.org -synergosamc.com -synergostech.com -synergosadvice.com -synergos.biz -synergosconsulting.net -synergosvc.com -synergos.ph) produced few sources that would meet Wikipedia's standards for sources, beyond some puff pieces highlighting the supposed exclusivity of Synergos' "Global Philanthropy Circle." The page was created by the Communications Director for Synergos by their own admission (see the article's talk page), so one wouldn't even be able to argue that the organisation was at least notable enough for some Wikipedian to have created it. I recognise that debates over notability, COI, etc have occurred in the past, but disagree on the consensus that was apparently reached at the time. As far as I can tell this is the first time the page has been nominated for deletion outright. CongealedBox ( talk) 05:59, 7 December 2023 (UTC) reply

(Global Philanthropy Circle: Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook