The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 10:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Notability. google searches for "Synergos" after excluding various websites named "Synergos" (the search prompt I ended up using was "synergos" -synergos.org -synergoscompanies.com -synergoscounseling.com -synergoshealth.com -synergosholdings.com -network.synergos.org -synergos-tech.com -experience.synergos.org -synergosamc.com -synergostech.com -synergosadvice.com -synergos.biz -synergosconsulting.net -synergosvc.com -synergos.ph) produced few sources that would meet Wikipedia's standards for sources, beyond some puff pieces highlighting the supposed exclusivity of Synergos' "Global Philanthropy Circle." The page was created by the Communications Director for Synergos by their own admission (see the article's talk page), so one wouldn't even be able to argue that the organisation was at least notable enough for some Wikipedian to have created it. I recognise that debates over notability, COI, etc have occurred in the past, but disagree on the consensus that was apparently reached at the time. As far as I can tell this is the first time the page has been nominated for deletion outright. CongealedBox ( talk) 05:59, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 10:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Notability. google searches for "Synergos" after excluding various websites named "Synergos" (the search prompt I ended up using was "synergos" -synergos.org -synergoscompanies.com -synergoscounseling.com -synergoshealth.com -synergosholdings.com -network.synergos.org -synergos-tech.com -experience.synergos.org -synergosamc.com -synergostech.com -synergosadvice.com -synergos.biz -synergosconsulting.net -synergosvc.com -synergos.ph) produced few sources that would meet Wikipedia's standards for sources, beyond some puff pieces highlighting the supposed exclusivity of Synergos' "Global Philanthropy Circle." The page was created by the Communications Director for Synergos by their own admission (see the article's talk page), so one wouldn't even be able to argue that the organisation was at least notable enough for some Wikipedian to have created it. I recognise that debates over notability, COI, etc have occurred in the past, but disagree on the consensus that was apparently reached at the time. As far as I can tell this is the first time the page has been nominated for deletion outright. CongealedBox ( talk) 05:59, 7 December 2023 (UTC)